World faces new nuclear arms race, researchers warn

This picture taken on November 18, 2022 and released from North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on November 19, 2022 shows the launch of a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) “Hwasong Gun 17” at Pyongyang International Airport. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said he would respond to US threats with nuclear weapons, state media said on November 19, after Kim personally oversaw Pyongyang’s latest launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile. (Photo by KCNA VIA KNS / AFP)

STOCKHOLM, Sweden — Most of the world’s nuclear-armed states continued to modernize their arsenals last year, setting the stage for a new nuclear arms race, researchers warned Monday.

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said nuclear powers, including the United States and Russia — which account for around 90 percent of the world’s stockpile — had spent time last year “upgrading existing weapons and adding newer versions.”

Since the end of the Cold War, old warheads have generally been dismantled quicker than new ones have been deployed, resulting in a decrease in the overall number of warheads.

But SIPRI warned that the trend was likely to be reversed in the coming years.

“What we see now, first of all, is that the number of operational nuclear warheads is beginning to increase,” SIPRI Director Dan Smith told AFP.

Director of Stockholm-based think-tank Sipri Dan Smith

This was especially the case with China, which SIPRI said had about 600 nuclear warheads and had added 100 new warheads in  2023 and 2024.

“China is increasing its nuclear force steadily,” Smith said, adding that the country could reach 1,000 warheads in seven or eight years.

While that would still be well short of Russian and US arsenals, it would make China “a much bigger player,” said Smith.

He said the world faced new threats “at a particularly dangerous and unstable moment” for geopolitics, adding: “We see the warning signs of a new nuclear arms race coming.”

READ: Israel hits Iran defense ministry HQ, nuclear weapons-linked sites

‘Extensive programs’

SIPRI counted a total of 12,241 warheads in January 2025, of which 9,614 were in stockpiles for potential use.

The institute noted in its report that both Russia and the United States had “extensive programs underway to modernize and replace their nuclear warheads.”

The United Kingdom was not believed to have increased its number of warheads in 2024, but SIPRI said that given the country’s 2021 decision to raise its limit on the number of warheads from 225 to 260, it was likely to increase in the future.

Similarly, while France’s arsenal was believed to have remained steady at around 290, “its nuclear modernization program progressed during 2024.”

India and Pakistan both “continued to develop new types of nuclear weapon delivery systems in 2024.”

India had a “growing stockpile” of about 180 nuclear weapons at the start of 2025, the institute said, while Pakistan’s arsenal remained steady at about 170 warheads.

‘Doomsday scenarios’

SIPRI also noted that North Korea’s nuclear weapons program remained “central to its national security strategy,” estimating that it had around 50 warheads and was believed to possess “enough fissile material to reach a total of up to 90 warheads.”

Israel, which does not acknowledge its nuclear weapons, is also believed to be modernizing its arsenal, which SIPRI estimated was about 90 warheads at the start of the year.

Smith stressed that the looming nuclear arms race would not just be about “the numbers of warheads.”

“It’s an arms race which is going to be highly technological,” Smith said.

He added that it would be both in “outer space and in cyberspace” as the software directing and guiding nuclear weapons would be an area of competition.

The rapid development of artificial intelligence will also likely begin to play a part, at first as a complement to humans.

“The next step would be moving towards full automation. That is a step that must never be taken,” Smith said.

“If our prospects of being free of the danger of nuclear war were to be left in the hands of an artificial intelligence, I think that then we would be close to the doomsday scenarios.”